There are a lot of real-life documentary-type movies out there and usually, I don't recommend watching them since the constant movement of the camera tends to irritate me a lot. However, Hell House does the same thing differently and a lot better. For the uninitiated, this is your typical low-budget movie done in a handheld, camera-shot manner and still, it manages to impress. Just for records - I have not researched if Hell House [first of the three so far] is of the pseudo-genre of documentary that was used by the makers of The Poughkeepsie Tapes - I think believing that something like this happens for real, and can happen again, just adds more creepiness to the entire thing.
Doing 'The Poughkeepsie Tapes' but only a bit better!
The beginning of the movie is marked by the medical teams and investigators repeatedly mentioning YouTube videos and finding some lost footage - this sets the tone in a way. You realize that the movie is going to present itself in a non-Cinemascope manner and still, Hell House manages to hold your attention. It does so by not using too much music. It does it better by straight away jumping into the subject - the incident per se, without a big lead-up, which can be boring and predictable. I still rate The Poughkeepsie Tapes among the top contenders in this niche of horror moviemaking but Hell House [the original] has come close, dangerously close. It has a slower pace than the latter, and it does not try to interpret a reason or the doer. This one scene in The Poughkeepsie Tapes still remains in my mind where the cops uncover a truckload of VHS tapes that were used to record the torture and instantly it dawns on the viewer that this is not just about a serial killer, The Poughkeepsie Tapes is about someone who tortures and kills as regularly as we have supper. Now, to give some perspective, Hell House has more of these spooky scenes. The simple, close-up of the basement that comes up in the first few minutes of the movie is creepy - mind you, this is before the menacing footage even starts playing!
Performing the non-performance done right...
One more thing about the Hell House [first of the franchise] - the people in the footage, I am not sure if they are Actors, are closer to the real thing. They speak casually and clearly and even the swear words come through without any hesitation or effort. But the movie is far from perfect. For starters, there is too much low-light shooting across the length of the feature. You expect some scenes, I guess at least 30%, to be shot with some form of lighting at least? However, the makers chose to shoot the entire thing in low-lit, dull conditions where even the facial expressions are often hard to make out.
Some hints are always welcome!
- raw footage-type storytelling that seems to be loved by many
- no explanation of what is actually happening which adds to the curiosity
- no known faces as none of the actors are in the top league - unknown faces in horror movies boost the realness
- a longing sense of creepiness that remains until the last shot
- no typical horror genre culprits like lost souls, serial murderers who just won't die, some Japanese curse, or the manifestation of Satan himself
- short duration - such type of storytelling cannot be tolerated for a long duration and The Hell House is finely edited to keep the duration short
- lack of defining the theme of the movie - why are the hellacious forces at work in that property?
- too much of visually offsetting issues where the camera-shot footage is overused
- lack of clarity in viewing the clowns - they appear in glimpses that undercut their presence
- the all hell breaks lose angle is shortlived - not enough chaos and gore...just not enough!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please Share Your Thoughts...