7 Ways in Which Therapy for People with a ‘has-been’ & ‘never-flourished’ Mindset is Different

There’s a subtler sort of suffering that doesn’t arrive with broken bones or panic attacks; it arrives with old yearbooks and classmate timelines, with birthday messages you delete and the quiet clicks of sliding-scale promotions on LinkedIn that feel like doors closing on you again and again. Clients with a has-been or never-flourished mindset do not always come in asking to be “fixed.” They come in asking to have a polite argument with a future that never showed up. Their grief is not always loud; it is domestic and relentless — a long habit of waking up to the tension between an “actual self” and an “ideal self” that never arrived. This category of clinical work sits in the intersection of regret research, existential therapy, narrative repair, and life-review techniques: it borrows from Viktor Frankl’s search for meaning when meaning has been deferred, from Yalom’s existential matrix when the givens of life — freedom, death, responsibility, meaning — look like accusations, and from cognitive science research about counterfactual thinking and self-discrepancy that explain why some people are haunted by “if only.”

Therapy here is not primarily crisis management; it is an excavation of a life’s archive — interviews with the could-have-beens, dossiers on the may-have-beens, and practical work to decouple worth from applause. That means clinicians borrow from life-review protocols used effectively with older adults to reframe past events, from narrative therapy to help clients rewrite the scripts that define them, and from existential and meaning-centered interventions that accept regret as a signal rather than a pathology. The literature shows these approaches can reduce obsessive rumination and increase well-being when applied thoughtfully, but the nuance is the clincher: these clients require a different therapeutic choreography — more authoring than repairing, more reconciliation than reactivity.

The Therapy Room as a Museum of Abandoned Dreams — Sessions Become Curated Exhibitions, Not Only Symptom Lists

People who feel like “has-beens” often bring dossiers to therapy that read less like lists of symptoms and more like curatorial notes to a museum exhibit titled “Potential: Exhibited and Withdrawn.” The therapist’s room becomes a place where trophies, rejection letters, unopened books, half-finished projects, and memories of applause take on pathological weight. Clinically, this means the patient’s narrative is saturated with nostalgia and counterfactuals: the mind habitually runs alternate histories in which choices were different and success attained — a process researchers call counterfactual thinking — and those alternatives are not trivial fantasies but active emotional drivers that shape identity and mood. The therapist’s first task is to recognize this archive and resist two impulses: the comforting impulse to flatter or pander to “you could have” fantasies, and the corrective impulse to coldly dismantle them with “hard truth.” Instead, effective work borrows from narrative therapy and life-review: it externalizes the old script (making the story a thing the client owns rather than a boilerplate of failure), then curates it, mining for “unique outcomes” (small episodes that contradict the dominant negative narrative). Life-review studies—especially with older clients—show measurable gains in well-being, self-esteem, and reductions in obsessive reminiscence when structured reflection is guided by a clinician; the same scaffolding, adapted for younger or midlife clients, helps them catalogue what happened, why it mattered then, and why it need not define the rest of life. The work is slow and painstaking: you don’t erase the museum, you re-label exhibits and add context. Clinicians must also watch for the danger that clients glorify the past to avoid living in the present; nostalgia can be a refuge but also a sedative. The evidence base for guided reminiscence and life-review is robust in gerontology and promising when thoughtfully applied to midlife regret, so therapists can and should borrow protocols and measurement tools from that literature.

The Never-Flourished: Excavation, Not Rescue — Therapy Often Means Building Identity From Unremarkable Materials

Not everyone with the “never-flourished” label was a failed wunderkind. More commonly, these are clients who were suitable, competent, invisible — not spectacular, not disastrous — and who woke one day to realize the cultural narrative of success had simply bypassed them. Their experience is different from trauma or acute pathology; it’s cumulative invisibility. Clinically, the work becomes archeology: identifying latent capacities, reclaiming the moral credit of persistence, and reframing quotidian competence as durable currency. The psychological theory of possible selves — the internal images people have of themselves as future beings — helps here; therapists use interventions that make alternate positive possible selves concrete and actionable, translating vague “I should have” fantasies into stepwise, credible “I might still.” This is not empty cheerleading. It is behavioral activation married to identity rehearsal: clients are asked to take small, identity-congruent actions (teach one class, write a proposal, request feedback) that produce evidence the “never-flourished” self was a matter of context, not worth. Social comparison research tells us that upward comparisons (measuring ourselves against those more successful) can motivate or demoralize depending on perceived attainability; therapists therefore calibrate comparisons to be learning tools rather than warrants for self-dismissal, guiding clients toward vicarious learning rather than envy. In cultures like India, where familial expectations and status narratives are thick, therapists also need to address intergenerational dimensions: what was promised, what was feasible, and how the client’s choices interlaced with socio-economic realities. Excavation therapy, when done well, slowly converts the residue of a life into a workable foundation for meaning.

The Therapist’s Tightrope: Validation Without Enabling, Honesty Without Annihilation

Therapists working with clients stuck on “could have been” territory learn quickly that empathy alone is anesthetic and brutal reality alone is corrosive. Validation — acknowledging the pain and the real losses — is necessary because regret is often rationalized; clients actually did miss opportunities, were disappointed, or were constrained by circumstance. But excessive validation risks reinforcing self-victim narratives that stall growth. Conversely, blunt reality checks (e.g., “You missed your chance, now move on”) can exacerbate shame and shame-based withdrawal. The clinical art is a dialectic: validate the authentic grief and then scaffold toward agency. Existential approaches are especially valuable here because they reframe regret as an ontological problem — part of being finite and free — rather than as a shameful pathology to be excised. Yalom’s framed concerns (death, freedom, isolation, meaninglessness) are useful therapeutic pivots: acknowledging that missed chances sharpen our awareness of finitude can, paradoxically, catalyze new choices. Cognitive approaches teach clients to identify maladaptive counterfactual loops (the “if only” automatons) and practice cognitive restructuring; narrative therapy helps them author counter-stories; meaning-centered techniques (logotherapy and related interventions) help them locate purpose beyond performance metrics. Empirical work shows that existentially oriented interventions can reduce depression and meaninglessness when combined with cognitive techniques — a pragmatic compromise that is essential in this population. The therapist, therefore, walks a tightrope: offer company in the dark, but bring a torch.

The Compulsive Comparison Syndrome — Social Media and the Perpetual Festival of Others’ Lives

One reason the “has-been” phenomenon has proliferated in the last decade is social media’s relentless indexing of other people’s milestones. Upward social comparison is an ancient mechanism, but the modern environment turns it into a persistent, automated torment. Research on social comparison and its effects on self-esteem shows the obvious: constant exposure to curated others increases feelings of inadequacy and regret when clients evaluate their own life trajectories, especially during sensitive windows like midlife or career plateaus. Therapeutically, the work is behavioral and narrative: interventions reduce trigger exposure (digital hygiene), reframe comparisons (use upward comparison as data for learning rather than as verdicts), and develop counterfactual literacy so clients can tolerate imagining alternative histories without being emotionally hijacked. Schema work is useful here: many clients carry "ought" and "ideal" self-standards (as per self-discrepancy theory) that were internalized from caregivers, schools, or cultures; therapy helps them renegotiate these standards. In India’s collectivist settings, where success is often relational (family honor, stability), therapists must attend to how clients’ social worlds amplify comparison and to the practical constraints that legitimately shaped earlier choices. Interventions that build self-compassion and reframe social media as information rather than identity tend to reduce the compulsive checking that keeps regret alive.

The Nostalgia Trap: When Past Applause Becomes an Identity (and the Work Is to Detoxify Nostalgia)

For many “has-beens,” the past is not a past — it is a currency. A teacher, a one-time award, a viral momentt becomes the coin they spend to navigate present life. This can be adaptive (it preserves a sense of worth) or toxic (it becomes the only thing sustaining identity). Therapy’s job is to detoxify nostalgia so that past success can be a resource rather than a straitjacket. Practically, clinicians use narrative reframing (placing past success in context: what skills, connections, and luck produced it), life-review to broaden memory beyond the single bright moment, and behavioral experiments to see whether the client’s valued traits (charisma, skill, expertise) can be expressed today in new forms. Philosophically, this is also an existential matter—Yalom’s notion of “existential guilt” (the sense that one has betrayed one’s potential) must be converted into constructive responsibility rather than paralyzing shame. The therapy often includes small projects that replicate the conditions that produced past success but with modern constraints—teaching, consulting, mentoring—which reconnect the client’s competence to present possibility. The risks are real: clients can become addicted to reminiscing because it shelters them from the labor of novelty. So the therapist must insist that memory fuels action, not replaces it. Evidence from life-review and narrative therapy supports this approach: when memory work is paired with concrete action planning, outcomes on self-esteem and life satisfaction improve.

The Existential Economics of Self-Worth — Shifting Value From Applause to Agency

A core question for the “never-flourished” and “has-been” alike is: on what ledger do I record my worth? Many have their self-worth pegged to external signals — promotion, applause, applause-adjacent metrics — so when those metrics fail the person, the soul bank is overdrafted. Therapy reframes self-worth as an economy of agency rather than achievement. Practically, that means clinicians encourage clients to build habits that generate micro-evidence of competence and meaning (small creative routines, volunteering, skill practice) and to practice the stoic assumption that purpose is chosen and created, not merely conferred. Logotherapy’s tenet — that meaning can be found through creating works, experiencing values, and adopting an attitude toward unavoidable suffering — is particularly suited here because it removes success from the pedestal and decouples it from worth. Behavioral activation methods help translate existential choice into digestible tasks; evidence-based work shows this combo reduces depressive rumination associated with midlife regret. Importantly, in India, where collective expectations still shape identity, therapists must be culturally literate: agency may mean choosing within family constraints, negotiating compromise, and finding dignity in roles that look modest to outside metrics. The economic metaphor helps: shift the books from “market value” to “intrinsic capital.” Therapists who succeed at this do not promise new fame; they promise a sturdier internal balance sheet.

Reparenting the Inner Disappointed Self — Long-Game Therapy That Re-teaches Permission to Begin Again

If there’s a therapeutic throughline for this group, it’s reparenting: teaching the client to give themselves permission the parents, schools, or early peers withheld. Long-term progress often looks less like a dramatic transformation and more like accrual: tiny rebellions against self-criticism, repeated choices that recalibrate identity, and ritualized small wins that eventually rewrite expectation. Clinically, reparenting uses techniques from schema therapy (to repair early maladaptive patterns), compassionate mind training (to build an internal ally rather than an internal judge), and graded exposure to new roles (taking small leadership opportunities, performing in low-stakes venues). This is slow, sometimes humbling work: clients must practice tolerating the awkwardness of being a beginner at 40, 50, or 60. The therapist’s role is to model patience and steadiness, keep a ledger of improvement, and celebrate “marginal gains” that the client’s culture might dismiss. Empirical literature supports the efficacy of such interventions — combining cognitive-behavioral tools with existential meaning work produces measurable gains in well-being and life satisfaction among midlife populations and those with entrenched regret cycles. Importantly, therapy here is not about “getting over” lost potential; it is about living with the ghost and slowly learning to dance with it, turning the haunting into a teacher rather than a jailer. 

Lives as Unfinished Symphonies, Not Failed Concerts

One of the hardest clinical truths is that therapy cannot always produce the dramatic “comeback” narrative clients secretly buy into — and for many purposes, that’s not the point. The work is not to manufacture success trophies where there were none; it is to repair the relationship with the self so the life that follows can be authentic rather than performative. People who arrive with the has-been or never-flourished mindset deserve a therapeutic contract that treats regret as a natural, often useful human response and then moves to build practices that free them from rumination. That contract is pragmatic and humane: acknowledge the loss, study it, salvage the lessons, and put energy into projects that reflect current capacities and values. Clinically, this blend of narrative reframing, life-review, existential meaning work, and small-step behavioral activation is backed by decades of research and decades more of clinical wisdom. For India-connected clients, the approach must also be context-wise — account for familial scripts, socio-economic constraints, and cultural narratives of success — because therapy that ignores context offers hollow consolation. Above all, the therapeutic task is to accept that “becoming someone” is not a single trajectory that either happened or didn’t; it is a messy, recursive practice that can begin at any age, and the most humane metric is not applause but the capacity to wake, choose, and act with a bit more coherence than yesterday.

References:

Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin.

PubMed

Higgins, E. T. (1987/1989). Self-discrepancy theory. Psychological Review / Handbook chapters.

ScienceDirect

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology / conceptual sources.

ResearchGate

Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s Search for Meaning (Logotherapy and meaning-focused intervention).

Antilogicalism

Yalom, I. D. (1980). Existential Psychotherapy (on existential guilt, meaning, responsibility).

Wikipedia

Heidenreich, T. et al. (2021). Existential approaches and CBT review. PMC / NCBI.

PMC

Sharif, F., et al. (2018). Effectiveness of life review therapy — PMC (meta/clinical RCT evidence).

PMC

Preschl, B., et al. (2012). Life-review therapy outcomes (PubMed).

PubMed

Lin, J. et al. (2024). Updated meta-analysis of life review therapy.

ScienceDirect

Leahy, R. (APA podcast/interview). If Only…Finding Freedom From Regret (practical clinician perspective).

American Psychological Association

Festinger, L. (1954). Social comparison theory — classic conceptual source; applied in modern social media studies.

nobaproject.com

Sisler, S. (2021). Social comparison and media — PMC review.

PMC

Roese, N. J., & Summerville, A. (2005). What we regret most … and why. PMC.

PMC

Research on midlife, regret, and cultural context — recent Indian analyses and midlife crisis reviews (IJIP, Indian Journal sources).

ijip.in

Narrative therapy primers — Michael White & David Epston; practical handbooks (Verywell overview).

Verywell Mind

APA, NIMH, WHO resources on depression, trauma, and evidence-based psychotherapies (standard clinical frameworks).

American Psychological Association

Reviews on existential therapies and empirical status (2023–2024 articles on PMC/ScienceDirect).

PMC

Cognitive and behavioral tools for rumination and counterfactual therapy (evidence summarized in cognitive therapy literature).

PubMed