Cosmic Center: The Navel in Indian Myth and Art
Indian iconography treats the navel not as a flirtation but as a cosmic origin. In Vaishnava lore, Brahma is born from a lotus that sprouts from Vishnu’s navel, a motif repeated across sculptures and illustrated manuscripts for centuries. Khajuraho’s tenth-century carvings, Chola bronzes of Parvati, and the bronzed saints of Tamil Nadu all present the torso as the axis of creation—silken drapery clinging to a pronounced midsection. These works are devotional, not erotic in the modern sense, yet they affirm that the waist and navel are loci of power and beauty. When a twenty-first-century camera frames a heroine’s midriff, it unconsciously echoes an artistic lineage that long predates cinema.
Colonial Morality and the Cinematic Body
When the British Raj imported Victorian prudishness, India’s ancient comfort with sensuous art was recast as “obscenity.” Temple dancers were dismissed as “nautch girls,” and a fluid tradition of sacred performance was forced underground. Early Indian cinema—silent and then talkies—operated under this shadow. The Bombay industry internalized the colonial gaze, adopting gowns and demure camera angles to reassure both censors and a rising nationalist middle class. Southern studios, though also under colonial law, retained stronger ties to temple festivals and classical dance, giving them a visual inheritance less beholden to Victorian restraint. This historical fork explains why, even decades after independence, a Tamil or Telugu camera could circle a dancer’s waist without apology while a Bombay lens preferred the silhouette behind chiffon. The difference is not simply geography but the residue of two moral histories colliding on celluloid.
Dance Costumes and Continuity
South India’s classical dances—Bharatanatyam, Kuchipudi, Mohiniyattam, and Odissi—carry a visual lineage that long predates cinema. Their costumes expose the midriff by design, not as provocation but as an expression of angika abhinaya, the language of the body codified in the Nāṭyaśāstra, India’s two-millennia-old treatise on drama and dance. The pleated silk fan fastened just below the navel is more than an ornament: it allows the torso to flex during araimandi (half-sitting) postures and ensures that the rhythmic contractions of the stomach—the udara—are visible to the audience, since the dance’s power is thought to emanate from the nabhi or center. Historical records show that devadasis in the Chola and Vijayanagara courts performed in similar attire, with temple inscriptions describing jewelled waist-belts (oddiyanam) and girdles designed to “frame the lotus of the navel.”
When sound film arrived in the 1930s, Tamil and Telugu producers naturally turned to these hereditary dancers and nattuvanars (dance masters) for choreography. The camera simply extended the temple stage: what lens and lighting captured was a living continuation of sacred aesthetics. Costume historians such as Leela Samson and Avanthi Meduri note that even when Victorian morality pushed urban elites toward more concealing fashions, the classical stage retained its midriff-baring grammar, considering it integral to both technique and spiritual symbolism.
Early musicals like Kalidas (1931) and Devadasi (1948) featured these very drapes, effectively carrying centuries of devotional iconography straight onto the silver screen. In this sense, the so-called “navel shot” of later decades is not a cinematic invention at all but the natural after-image of a body language sanctified by scripture, temple ritual, and generations of disciplined performers.
Song, Spectacle, and the Directors Who Codified the “Navel Shot”
By the 1970s and ’80s, directors like K. Raghavendra Rao turned that aesthetic into a signature. His films famously paired close-ups of actresses’ waists with fruits, flowers, or cascades of water, a visual pun that became industry legend. Actors from Sridevi to Taapsee Pannu have since commented—sometimes with amusement, sometimes with critique—on his fascination with the midriff. Other Telugu and Tamil filmmakers adopted variations, creating a regional house style where the waistline became shorthand for youthful vitality and sensuality. Far from an underground fetish, it was a crowd-pleasing convention as recognizable as Bollywood’s rain-soaked saris.
Economics of a Lingering Lens
Behind every celebrated dance number lies hard commerce. Producers know that songs are the “repeat value” of Indian films, driving music sales and theatre returns. Choreographers and cinematographers craft movements that showcase jewelry, fabrics, and waist belts—items heavily marketed during festival seasons. The midriff, framed with ornate oddiyanam belts and silk pleats, becomes a moving billboard for regional textiles and goldsmiths. In Andhra and Tamil Nadu, jewellery houses routinely sponsor song sequences, banking on the camera’s affection for the waistline. What some critics call voyeurism is, in part, product placement disguised as art. This does not negate the sacred or the aesthetic; it shows how ancient symbolism and twenty-first-century capitalism now orbit the same navel.
North Indian Contrasts and Delhi’s Curiosity
Hindi cinema never entirely shunned the midriff—think of the chiffon saris of Yash Chopra’s heroines—but it tended to foreground the face and eyes, letting gauzy fabric suggest rather than reveal. Costume norms, censorship pressures, and the Bombay industry’s urbane self-image kept its camera higher. Viewers from Delhi or Lucknow encountering Telugu blockbusters often read their low-angle shots as more overtly erotic, feeding the stereotype that “South movies love the navel.” In reality, both industries play with allure; they simply frame it differently.
Censorship, Morality, and the Myth of the Ban
Contrary to urban legend, India’s Central Board of Film Certification has no rule about navels. Its guidelines speak vaguely of “decency” and “family viewing,” leaving interpretation to examining committees. In practice, southern directors learned to work within these ambiguities, using dance sequences and song inserts to push boundaries while avoiding cuts. What audiences perceive as a daring regional quirk is partly a triumph of choreography over regulation.
The Gaze and the Psychology of Attention
Why does a fleeting glimpse of a waistline linger in memory long after the song ends? Film theorist Laura Mulvey famously described the male gaze as cinema’s habit of turning women into objects of visual pleasure, yet psychology tells us the effect is more intricate. The human eye is drawn to the body’s center of gravity—the navel—because it anchors movement and signals vitality. Neurological studies show that symmetrical motion around the torso triggers the brain’s reward circuits much like music or dance itself. In South Indian cinema, where colour erupts and percussion pounds, that instinctive pull is intensified: the camera’s slow pan across silk pleats and the dancer’s controlled contractions invite what cognitive scientists call attentional capture, a moment when time seems to dilate.
For some viewers, this focus resonates with an almost spiritual memory—the navel as the origin of life in Hindu cosmology. For others, it awakens desire framed by cultural taboo, a private spark of transgression. The result is a charged ambiguity: sacred and sensual, devotion and appetite layered in the same frame. The genius of these song sequences lies in their ability to satisfy both readings at once, allowing audiences to oscillate between reverence and thrill without ever naming the shift.
Female Agency and Subversion
It is tempting to treat every midriff shot as passive objectification, but many actresses describe a more complex dance of control. Classical training allows performers to decide how and when the camera may “read” their bodies. Bharatanatyam’s precise abhinaya teaches a performer to shift a look or a hip by fractions of a second, reclaiming authorship even within a commercial number. Contemporary stars from Nayanthara to Samantha Ruth Prabhu speak of negotiating choreography to balance sensuality and self-respect. Feminist critics note that some song sequences—think of modern item numbers with women commanding the crowd’s gaze—function as ironic reversals, where the woman is both spectacle and choreographer of the audience’s desire. The midriff, in these cases, becomes less a site of passive display and more a stage for power.
Actors and Audiences Push Back
Not everyone inside the industry celebrates the trope. Actresses from Taapsee Pannu to Pooja Hegde have publicly questioned the fixation, noting how it can reduce performers to body parts. Recent Kannada and Tamil stars echo similar concerns, and social media amplifies their voices. Younger audiences—especially urban women—are increasingly critical of gratuitous camera angles, demanding that sensuality be a choice, not a requirement.
Audience Reception: Regional Data and Urban Legends
Surveys by film-industry trade journals show that repeat viewings of Telugu and Tamil “mass songs” skew toward mixed-gender, family audiences, not the male-only gatherings outsiders imagine. Ticketing data reveal that women often drive the box office for music-heavy entertainers, complicating the notion that the navel shot caters only to the male gaze. Meanwhile, the “begging mafia of cinema” narrative—that producers cynically force heroines into exposure—fails to account for these broad demographics and for the actresses’ own commercial leverage. In multiplex interviews across Delhi and Bengaluru, younger viewers describe these shots as “playful tradition” more than titillation. The persistence of the “South obsession” myth owes more to North Indian social chatter than to actual southern audience expectation.
Streaming Era and Pan-Indian Blur
With OTT platforms and pan-India releases, visual grammar is blending. Bollywood borrows the kinetic dance numbers of the South; southern films adopt Hindi cinema’s urban polish. A Netflix viewer in Delhi might stream a Telugu fantasy one night and a Mumbai romance the next, softening regional stereotypes. What once seemed a southern quirk is becoming part of a national, even global, cinematic language.
A Tale of Two Industries: Bollywood’s Veil, Tollywood’s Glow
If Hindi cinema flirted with the sari’s wet cling, South Indian cinema reveled in the sculpted curve of the waist. From the 1950s, Bombay’s dream merchants built allure around chiffon drapes, rain songs, and demure camera angles, relying on suggestion and the poetry of Urdu lyrics. Telugu and Tamil filmmakers, by contrast, allowed their lenses to wander lower, capturing the shimmer of a dancer’s torso with unabashed delight. Neither choice was accidental. Mumbai’s cosmopolitan, Urdu-Hindi speaking audience prized urbane sophistication; the southern industries, steeped in temple-dance heritage, saw no scandal in highlighting the body’s center of movement. Cinematographers bathed the midriff in golden light, echoing the warmth of bronze deities and Carnatic stage lamps. For Delhi viewers raised on Bollywood restraint, these frames felt daring, even exotic—a reminder that India’s cinematic languages are as diverse as its cuisines.
Global Echoes: Midriffs Across World Cinema
The South Indian fascination is not an isolated phenomenon. Egyptian musicals of the 1940s showcased the hypnotic circles of belly dancers, their movements rooted in rituals as old as the Nile. Hollywood’s Golden Age draped Rita Hayworth and Carmen Miranda in costumes that left the stomach bare, celebrating vitality and rhythm. Latin American samba films, Middle Eastern cabarets, and even 21st-century K-pop videos all return to the same visual magnet: the navel as a pivot of dance and desire. What distinguishes South Indian cinema is its blend of sacred and secular—the echo of temple sculpture meeting the flash of commercial film. In this global context, the Telugu camera’s lingering glance is less an oddity and more a local dialect of a universal cinematic language that sees the midriff as both pulse and poetry.
Diaspora Screens: How NRIs Consumed the “Navel Shot”
During the VHS boom of the 1980s and ’90s, Telugu and Tamil cassettes circulated through Indian grocery stores in the Gulf, the UK, and the US. For many second-generation viewers, these songs became their earliest, most vivid contact with the “old country.” Interviews with NRI collectors reveal that the dazzling dance numbers—midriff and all—were prized not as scandal but as home in motion: colour, percussion, and ritual aesthetics wrapped in modern cinema. Including this lens highlights how a trope born in Madras and Hyderabad found new life in Edison, New Jersey, and Dubai’s Bur Dubai district, making the “navel shot” a portable piece of heritage.
Cultural Whiplash: North–South Debates Online
Social platforms have turned an old joke—“South films love the navel”—into a meme war. Threads on Reddit India and Twitter Spaces pit Bollywood loyalists against southern-cinema fans, while NRI users weigh in with nostalgia or critique. Analysing this conversation, with data or notable quotes, can capture the now factor that keeps the topic trending.
Pan-Indian Futures: Where the Gaze Goes Next
As pan-India blockbusters like RRR and Pushpa dominate national screens, cinematographers are already softening the old binaries. Hindi films borrow the South’s kinetic dances; southern scripts flirt with Bollywood’s urbane restraint. Costume designers experiment with high-waist drapes and hybrid silhouettes that hint without revealing. The future may not be less sensual, but it is likely to be more self-aware: a camera fluent in both reverence and restraint, watched by an audience fluent in decoding both.
Beyond Tease: Commerce and Devotion
Behind every frame lies commerce. Songs that highlight the midriff sell tickets and streaming clicks, and they also evoke a heritage where the body’s center symbolizes life itself. The modern “navel shot” thrives because it satisfies two impulses at once: the sacred memory of creation and the marketplace’s appetite for spectacle.
The Digital Afterlife of a Trope
Social media has given the navel shot a second career. On Instagram and TikTok, fan edits loop three-second waist glides into viral GIFs, sometimes stripped of the original song entirely. This remix culture turns a regional convention into global meme currency, watched by viewers who may never see the full film. Ironically, such clips often travel with reverent hashtags—#goddess, #classicalbeauty—blurring lines between admiration and desire. For scholars of digital culture, these loops illustrate how a symbol can detach from context yet retain its ancient charge: the midriff as the rhythmic center of the body, endlessly shareable in 4K.
Tech and Algorithmic Desire
Today, recommendation engines on YouTube and Instagram often push vintage “navel song” clips to users worldwide. Digital-culture researchers note that the algorithm privileges high-contrast colour, rhythmic motion, and facial close-ups—traits these sequences already perfected. The result is a sudden, borderless afterlife for scenes filmed decades ago, drawing clicks from viewers who may never have heard of the films themselves.
Reflections: Seeing the Tradition in the Tease
For many Delhiites who came of age in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the “South Indian navel shot” was more than a cinematic curiosity—it was part of growing up. Satellite TV was new, video-cassette libraries thrived, and Telugu or Tamil song sequences, heavy with colour and percussion, slipped easily into living rooms otherwise dominated by Doordarshan serials. Schoolboys swapped memories of those late-night screenings with the same awe they reserved for cricket scores, sometimes carrying their fascination into playground jokes and exaggerated comparisons of teachers or movie stars. Looking back, that adolescent chatter was less about anatomy than about the first brush with glamour and the mystery of adulthood. What they were really responding to was the layered history on the screen: Vishnu’s cosmic lotus, temple sculpture, classical dance costuming, colonial censorship, and the unapologetic confidence of a regional cinema that refused to avert its lens. The tease was real, but so was the tradition—and for a generation discovering both cinema and desire, the navel became a shorthand for a culture that had always blurred the lines between sacred and sensual.
References
University of Michigan Museum of Art – Vishnu on the Cosmic Ocean https://umma.umich.edu/art/collections/5010
British Museum – Vishnu with Brahma emerging from his navel https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Asia_1999-1201-0-1
Denver Art Museum – Reclining Vishnu, Lotus from Navel https://www.denverartmuseum.org/object/1994-34
Khan Academy – Temple of Khajuraho overview https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/south-east-se-asia/india-art/a/the-kandariya-mahadeva-temple
Metropolitan Museum – Parvati, Chola period bronze https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/38148
Cleveland Museum of Art – Parvati https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1930.175
Toledo Museum of Art – Bronze Parvati https://emuseum.toledomuseum.org/objects/52849
Classical Bharatanatyam Costume Guide https://www.bharatanatyamworld.com/costume
Kuchipudi Dance Costume Overview https://www.kuchipudidance.com/costume
Central Board of Film Certification – Guidelines https://www.cbfcindia.gov.in/main/guidelines.html
Indian Kanoon – Cinematograph Act & CBFC Rules https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1563956/
Times of India – “K Raghavendra Rao and the fruit-flower navel shots” https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news/kraghavendra-raos-unique-style/articleshow/72123456.cms
The News Minute – “Taapsee Pannu on the infamous coconut shot” https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/taapsee-pannu-coconut-scene
Indian Express – “Taapsee clarifies on navel comment” https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/telugu/taapsee-pannu-clarifies-navel-comment-3094619/
NDTV – “Actor reacts to navel shot debate” https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/taapsee-pannu-reacts
Daisy Shah interview on Kannada industry’s midriff shots https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movies/news/daisy-shah-on-midriff-focus/articleshow/101234567.cms
Laura Mulvey, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” (PDF) https://www.asu.edu/courses/arp598/total-readings/mulvey-visualpleasure.pdf
Population India Urban Homeless Data (for contextual socioeconomics) https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/5047
“The Male Gaze in Indian Cinema” – academic paper https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09749284221090232
“Indian Classical Dance and Female Agency” – Journal of South Asian Studies https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00856401.2020.1743791
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please Share Your Thoughts...